I'm training based on a sample code I found on the Internet. The accuracy in testing is at 92% and the checkpoints are saved in a directory. In parallel (the training is running for 3 days now) I want to create my prediction code so I can learn more instead of just waiting.
This is my third day of deep learning so I probably don't know what I'm doing. Here's how I'm trying to predict:
- Instantiate the model using the same code as in training
- Load the last checkpoint
- Try to predict
The code works but the results are nowhere near 90%.
Here's how I create the model:
INPUT_LAYERS = 2 OUTPUT_LAYERS = 2 AMOUNT_OF_DROPOUT = 0.3 HIDDEN_SIZE = 700 INITIALIZATION = "he_normal" # : Gaussian initialization scaled by fan_in (He et al., 2014) CHARS = list("abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ .") def generate_model(output_len, chars=None): """Generate the model""" print('Build model...') chars = chars or CHARS model = Sequential() # "Encode" the input sequence using an RNN, producing an output of HIDDEN_SIZE # note: in a situation where your input sequences have a variable length, # use input_shape=(None, nb_feature). for layer_number in range(INPUT_LAYERS): model.add(recurrent.LSTM(HIDDEN_SIZE, input_shape=(None, len(chars)), init=INITIALIZATION, return_sequences=layer_number + 1 < INPUT_LAYERS)) model.add(Dropout(AMOUNT_OF_DROPOUT)) # For the decoder's input, we repeat the encoded input for each time step model.add(RepeatVector(output_len)) # The decoder RNN could be multiple layers stacked or a single layer for _ in range(OUTPUT_LAYERS): model.add(recurrent.LSTM(HIDDEN_SIZE, return_sequences=True, init=INITIALIZATION)) model.add(Dropout(AMOUNT_OF_DROPOUT)) # For each of step of the output sequence, decide which character should be chosen model.add(TimeDistributed(Dense(len(chars), init=INITIALIZATION))) model.add(Activation('softmax')) model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy']) return model
In a separate file predict.py
I import this method to create my model and try to predict:
...import code model = generate_model(len(question), dataset['chars']) model.load_weights('models/weights.204-0.20.hdf5') def decode(pred): return character_table.decode(pred, calc_argmax=False) x = np.zeros((1, len(question), len(dataset['chars']))) for t, char in enumerate(question): x[0, t, character_table.char_indices[char]] = 1. preds = model.predict_classes([x], verbose=0)[0] print("======================================") print(decode(preds))
I don't know what the problem is. I have about 90 checkpoints in my directory and I'm loading the last one based on accuracy. All of them saved by a ModelCheckpoint
:
checkpoint = ModelCheckpoint(MODEL_CHECKPOINT_DIRECTORYNAME + '/' + MODEL_CHECKPOINT_FILENAME, save_best_only=True)
I'm stuck. What am I doing wrong?
3 Answers
Answers 1
In the repo you provided, the training and validation sentences are inverted before being fed into the model (as commonly done in seq2seq learning).
dataset = DataSet(DATASET_FILENAME)
As you can see, the default value for inverted
is True
, and the questions are inverted.
class DataSet(object): def __init__(self, dataset_filename, test_set_fraction=0.1, inverted=True): self.inverted = inverted ... question = question[::-1] if self.inverted else question questions.append(question)
You can try to invert the sentences during prediction. Specifically,
x = np.zeros((1, len(question), len(dataset['chars']))) for t, char in enumerate(question): x[0, len(question) - t - 1, character_table.char_indices[char]] = 1.
Answers 2
When you generate model in your predict.py file:
model = generate_model(len(question), dataset['chars'])
is your first parameter the same as in your training file? Or is the question length dynamic? If so, you are generating different model, thus your saved checkpoint doesn't work.
Answers 3
It can be the dimentionality of arrays/df passed not matching what is expected by the functions you call. When a single dimention is expected by the called method, try ravel
on what you expect to be a single dimention
0 comments:
Post a Comment