Note: I am not a proper python programmer... but I use python extensively. I do things like write classes with inheritance, use iterators and comprehension, etc. My point is that I do not have a full grasp of the language, e.g. what exactly constitutes an python object, why __init__.py is needed other than to specify a module, etc. In relation to Django, I have written multi-app sites (with the help of S.O.) and have really enjoyed Django's templating system, blocks, and how they can be nested. Now are my apps fully decoupled and reusable? That this is subject of this post.
I state this disclaimer because a lot of the Django resources seem to assume that one knows these things. This makes understanding some of the documentation and S.O. questions difficult for a person who is just an (subpower)-user. So please answer this question with that in mind.
Question
These questions are inspired by both the question When to create a new app with startapp in django? by @håkan and the answer given by @antti rasinen which links to James Bennett's 2008 PyCon presentation
A few key points from Bennett's presentation are:
- sites are a collection of apps
- an app does one thing and one thing well
Which directs me to his section "Project coupling kills re-use" that mentions:
- Single module directly on Python path (registration, tagging, etc.)
- Related modules under a package (ellington.events, ellington.podcasts, etc.)
Question 0
A "module" in this case is just an app made of other apps?
Question 1
(Apps with related functionality and shared models )
What should I do when apps share models?
In Barrett's slides he implies that user registration and user profiles are distinct and should be distinct apps. (He certainly states that profiles have nothing to do with user registration).
So if I wanted both, would my project have two apps like:
- user-registration
- user-profile
even though the app user-profile will need the user model from user-registration? Or do I make a single app (module):
- user-app
- registration
- profile
which contains both?
Question 2
(Apps with distinct functions but shared models)
Extending the example from question 1, lets say that my main app (or some other app that is used by the main app) utilizes some aspect of the user model (e.g. recently active members if it was a chat site).
Clearly my main app gets this information from the user model. Does my main app now get bundled under the user-app module?
This may not be the best example, but the point is as follows:
I have two apps app-dependency and app-needs-dependency, where each app does its one thing and one thing well... It is just that app-needs-dependency needs information from app-dependency. What do I do in this case, if everything else about app-needs-dependency is completely decoupled from app-dependency (so it could be used in other projects)?
Question 3
(writing apps for flexibility)
Now I have my site with its couple of apps. Each app does its one thing and does it well. The main app serves as the landing page/ overview in this case.
I want all my other apps to use / inherit the static and template files of the main app.
Where do I store all the static files and templates? In the main app and set that as the default for the other apps? Or where should these static files / templates (e.g. base.css, base.html) go? Do I make a copy of these files for each other app, so they can be run even though this is redundant?
Which makes my app more flexible?
4 Answers
Answers 1
I have to admit your question is not a technical one but rather a conceptual and dogmatic one. No answer is absolute and universally valid and every detail about how you project is structured and should behave can change the perspective. As you wrote, each Django app does one thing and it does it well.
I would extend that to the point that each app should contain no more than one Model and at most, it's closets dependents.
Ex: the Product with it's Category, Color, Image
You will have plenty of logic to cover inside that app with only these ones.
Try to look at Django framework as a tool to create your project..this is the final goal...but if you want also to create reusable apps try to create them as independent as possible, or at least dependent to some Django features:
ex: a reusable app and totally independent would be an app that only requires User Model, Sessions, Groups included in Django. You get the idea of dependent but still autonomous app.
An app is part of a project after all...either here or in other part after you build it. Look at it as if it would be a simple function...can run alone or can depend on other functions result...at what point you keep everything inside one function and when you decide to split them in 2 separate ones. So:
Question 0:
An app is the smallest piece that can run by it's own...having models, views, templates, urls, static files.
It can depend also on other apps...so answer is YES
Question 1:
Always keep things separate by functionality... User Auth is dealing with user creation and their authentication
User Profile is dealing with personal data of the User
Question 2:
Nothing gets bundled. Everything stays at the same level as 2 different but dependents apps
Question 3:
You can do as you wish.
You can do static as a central place and templates specific for each app or everything central. No right answer here but only what scales well for your project.
Answers 2
This is a great question and it covers all the questions associated to structuring the project I asked myself when i started working with Django.
Question 0:
Yes, in that case, a module is an app which consists of serveral apps (ellington.events, ellington.podcasts).
Question 1, Question 2, Question 3:
Django is a general purpose, full stack web framework. Since it is general purpose, a lot of it depends on your particular use case. You need not have an entire Django project follow a particular structure (if you want to achieve code reuse AND functional decoupling AND relational decoupling).
With that said, if you can prioritize what you want to achieve, you can go with one pattern over the other.
Let's take the example of Blog.
Code Reuse:
For achieving maximum code reuse, you have to identify what parts of your project is worthy of reuse. Once you have done that, you can set your project structure accordingly.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-CommonApps
--AbstractUser(abstract class (just like it's java counterpart) )
--AbstractActivity
--AbstractComment
--AbstractArticle
-ProjectApps
--BlogUser (extends AbstractUser)
--BlogActivity (extends AbstractActivity)
--BlogComment (extends AbstractComment)
--BlogArticle (extends AbstractArticle)
The functionalities that can be shared across multiple projects should be implemented in abstract apps, and the ones specific to project can be implemented in Project apps.
Relational Decoupling:
You can create apps to represent the relations between two other apps, and implement all the functionality involving two different apps in that relation.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-User
-UserActivityRelation
-Activity
-Article
-ArticleCommentRelation
-Comment
-UserCommentRelation
-and so on
Functional Decoupling:
This is the most common practice - create apps for particular functionality.
Project Structure:
BlogProject
-Article
-Activity
-User
-Comment
The point I am trying to make here is that the choice is yours. In more complex projects, it won't be so white and black.
You, depending on what an "app" means to you, and what you want it to do in a particular project and other projects, can decide on a particular structure.
Django keeps it abstract to give you the ability to do that.
I always go for an app setup that makes sense to that particular project. In a project not all apps are reusable. And having flexible/reusable apps does not make sense in all the cases.
As a general rule of thumb, Django devs say an App should be something whose functionality can be described with one sentence. But Django is designed so that you can bend the rules for your projects if you have to.
DISCLAIMER: Functional decoupling and relational decoupling aren't textbook terms. I just used them to describe what I meant here.
Answers 3
Question 0
A "module" in the Python context is simply a file that contains definitions and statements. So "related modules under a package" really just means "split your code into separate files based on what the code is doing".
Describing it as "an app made of other apps" is to start confusing Django's concept of an app with Python's concept of a module (which, as stated above is just a file that houses some code).
Question 1
What should I do when apps share models?
You should still try and stick to the "apps do one thing and do it well" maxim. In this case separate profile and registration apps seems like a good idea - because they have quite different functions. A registration app is going to contain the logic for allowing users to register on your site. A profile app is all about what information you will store about a user.
There is nothing wrong with these two apps having a relationship to each other - see below.
Question 2
Let's say that my main app (or some other app that is used by the main app) utilizes some aspect of the user model (e.g. recently active members if it was a chat site). Clearly my main app gets this information from the user model. Does my main app now get bundled under the user-app?
No. It should still be a separate app, with links to the other app.
The user model is actually a good example. Django allows you to specify a custom user model that lets you store whatever additional data you want about a user.
Now, there are loads of third party apps out there that do things like registration, authentication, etc for users. They are designed to work with any user model, not just Django's default one. The way they do that is to use get_user_model() wherever they need to reference the User model, instead of directly importing django.contrib.auth.models.User.
This means that you can use those third party apps with whatever user model you have defined for your own project.
Django's get_user_model() utility is there to serve a very common use case. However the same principle can be extended to your own apps. If there is a dependency between your apps that you think should be swappable, then you can provide a way to swap it out - e.g., a setting/configuration that allows any other project using your app to specify an alternative.
There are hundreds of examples of this kind of configurability in the Django ecosystem. For example, Django itself ships with its own django.contrib.auth authentication app. However if you want to implement your own authentication logic, you don't have to reimplement the entire auth app again yourself (that would be a huge pain). Instead you specify an an authentication backend that it's auth app will use to authenticate. The auth app is designed to allow any project to swap out a core piece of its functionality with minimal effort.
So in your main app, you might define a setting that controls which profile model to use. This means that if someone else wants to use a different profile model, they simply change this setting and they're all set. They are no longer tied to your profile app.
Question 3
The main app serves as the landing page/ overview in this case. I want all my other apps to use / inherit the static and template files of the main app. Where do I store all the static files and templates?
You should store the templates in each respective app. If your main app is providing the base templates, then those should reside in the main app.
If your profile app is then providing a registration view, then the template for that should live in the profile app. There is nothing wrong with it extending the base template from the main app - this can easily be overridden by a project that wants to.
It's fine to make assumptions about how two apps are related to each other - as long as you're careful to allow overriding of those assumptions.
Answers 4
Ans to Question 3 Where you store you static files greatly depend on your design pattern. From django documentation: store static files and templates that are particular to an app in that app folder and store generic static files in a central location described by STATICFILES_DIRS variable in your settings.py file. For total decoupling, I would suggest you have those static files created in a separate folder. It is also good practice to put them in the app where they belong.
Ans to Question 2 The answer to question 2 is similar to that of question 1 but I must highlight that app-needs-dependency cannot be totally separated from it's dependency. This can only be possible if it's dependency is defined to be generic and to do just one thing well.
Ans to Question 1 For the scenario mentioned in the question, it makes sense to separate the user-registration app from the user-profile app and make necessary imports when needed. Creating separate apps means skillfully managing or minimizing dependencies between files and not avoiding dependencies. You could create a base user model, which is generic enough, that could be extended by any other app and not just the user-profile app. It greatly depends on your intention to reuse the app created. I would suggest that you create generic base apps that could be extended if you envisage other possible usage aside the current use.
0 comments:
Post a Comment